LE3 .A278 2009

2009

Grieve, Malcolm

Acadia University

Bachelor of Arts

Honours

Political Science

Politics

Everyday, the Canadian government makes decisions through the interaction of the federal, provincial and municipal government. Although most citizens are only concerned with the outcome of these interactions, it it important to evaluate the process through which these decisions emerge. Typically, the process is mandated by legislation designating jurisdiction to a particular level of government. In the case of environmental legislation, the jurisdiction becomes less clear. This thesis will attempt to examine the interaction of tri-level governments through two environmental remediation projects in Nova Scotia in order to determine what factors slow down the process. Through an analysis of two separate environmental initiatives, the Halifax harbour and the Sydney tar ponds, it is obvious that there are three main features of the inter-governmental relations that are affecting the timely completion of these projects. The factors that impede progress are the jurisdictional duplication and vagueness on environmental issues, competing goals and objectives of the stakeholders, and cost-sharing and funding strategies in developing these projects. Analyzing these factors within specific cases gives insight into the real decision process behind environmental issues. With the environment weighing more on the Canadian conscience today, it is more important than ever to ensure an effective framework for the interaction of the municipal, provincial and federal governments.

The author retains copyright in this thesis. Any substantial copying or any other actions that exceed fair dealing or other exceptions in the Copyright Act require the permission of the author.

https://scholar.acadiau.ca/islandora/object/theses:581